Communication is a liberal arts major

Are Liberal Arts and Humanities Degrees Useless? If so, why are these degrees not being eliminated? Why do some people think they are useless?

English major (changed from mechanical engineering, no less!) Reporting for the service.

No matter where technology takes us in terms of language processing and machine learning, good writing is a desirable skill. It will serve you well anywhere, in any job you ever have.

And also the leadership skills. One carried out by DDI and by Fast Company Reported study suggests that both undergraduate and graduate companies score high in areas with which we associate leaders in general, including entrepreneurship and influence. Perhaps the more notable finding, however, was that "Humanities graduates outperformed MBAs in a number of areas essential to leadership performance."

Let me repeat that for all the parents out there who shake their heads at the choice of their children: The humanities make better leaders than an MBA.

Given that a liberal arts degree is the most popular undergraduate degree, this is encouraging news for young professionals with a degree in any number of majors - music, religion, Spanish. Regardless of what people (and the media) like to say, is four years that you have been dealing with the for you interesting subjects have dealt, not worthless - not at all.

If you are into the humanities and humanities studies, it is important to remember that there is so much more to your career than the required skills that you often find in a job description. Think: a philosopher's “strong communication skills” can easily surpass a major engineer practicing the same profession. Or a classic course of study can lead to a student taking a position in marketing.

It's about figuring out how to tailor your education to the job market you have invested in. With that in mind, I think that people who dismiss the humanities as useless simply have no imagination. Something the liberal arts might be able to help you with ...

You are not.

Liberal arts are fundamental skills that serve as the foundation for many subject areas. The thing about the liberal arts is that they don't need any special skills to understand them, and people in general (though not as much as I'd hope ...) have a good idea of ​​what's going on in their world because they have lived in it long enough. They know where they are from, what has happened lately. People keep up with the times and know the general opinion of things. When someone like me completes a degree in fine arts, such as history or philosophy, they have the opportunity to delve deeper into the understanding they have already acquired. Although I could say that it is worth knowing the role of the Catholic Church in the Crusades or describing the relationship between ethics and aesthetics, most people act on a different level than such inquiries. In general, people take things for granted that the liberal arts are focused on. They take on their own history and philosophical belief and move on with their lives, which is fine. While I will say that a small change in the fundamental level of your understanding of history or philosophy could seriously affect your understanding of "real life," only the individual really benefits from this type of effort. The decomposition of society into its basic elements is good in terms of "progress", but if people are wrong about seemingly trivial things in their "real life" they will likely just be upset (this is why people hated Socrates) .

In summary, it can be said that the liberal arts are not useless. They are not often practical or profitable in "real life," but they are very useful for gaining an understanding of the world. Really, just read a good book and tell me it was a waste of time.

I have a PhD in EE. Don't regret taking Liberal Arts classes during graduate school.

Have trained my brain with too many goal-directed (Math & Sci) problems and sometimes feel crippled when tackling problems that require holistic thinking that trains you in the humanities and humanities. (I'm studying history now)

Edit: I realized so late in my career that you have to understand and consider different viewpoints and reconcile inherent contradictions in order to convince and motivate people. If you only do this from the point of view of the goal, you are either shying away from people or turning out to be the most hated guy on the team and none of you are motivated to do your best.

In typical essay-based reasoning tasks that you get in Liberal Arts programs, there is no one correct answer. You read and digest the points of view of several thinkers and synthesize your own. This imho trains your H-thinking and helps you convince people which later turns out to be the most useful trait for career growth.

Humanities are certainly not useless. They need to be complemented with management / business courses to monetize H-thinking skills.

I find that morbidly fascinating - like a building collapsing in preparation for what is going to happen. In a sense, it is.

Did we really believe that the only value of higher education is preparation for employment? Do we have no other measure of the value of learning than the impact of a degree on future earnings potential? Have we lost sight of the distinction between symbol and substance in such a way that we confuse having a degree with having an education?

A culture that so despises education, that has such a mercenary stance ... Sure, the people who are in it benefit - even thrive - but this culture dies in general.

I am very concerned about the prospects for American culture. One of the factors driving the ongoing demolition of education in our society is the economic importance of the degree. In what? In any case, it doesn't matter because you probably won't be majoring in anyway! And we wonder why fraud is so widespread not only among students but also among professors, academics, and researchers. And curricula keep coming down - why? Because of the pressures to get degrees, and who cares what students learn or know?

The students certainly don't. As long as they receive the sacred fetish after their four-year (or six-year or ten-year) shamanic ordeal, the older shamans give them this as a gift. When education has no value of its own, education becomes a cargo cult.

What will this country be like when a generation or two has accumulated who have never bothered to keep the sayings or means of the Constitution because they will not see the economic value when they learn it? We've already had a massive financial meltdown and are living on the brink of depression because an entire generation didn't understand their grandparents' story enough to understand why it was important to uphold the Glass-Steagall Act, or understand enough to understand it about the story of your great-grandparents understanding that laissez-faire capitalism is a hellishly dangerous and inherently unjust thing.

What kind of country would you like to live in thirty years from now? Therefore it's about education.

Are Liberal Arts and Humanities Degrees Useless?

Well, the answer to that question probably depends on what a person wants to use these types of degrees for. If the graduate is pursuing an engineering career, the degree may not impress potential employers very much. On the other hand, the communication skills and insights into the human condition that can be gained through a liberal upbringing can be incredible.

In fact, the improved oral and written communication skills that can be obtained through a liberal upbringing are likely to have real potential due to such an insight into the human condition! For example, if you have learned a great deal about human behavior by studying the humanities, you can likely quickly adapt your language and rhetoric to a wide variety of cultural / social situations, and since business depends on people, you have this enhanced ability to connect with people , could actually lead to financial gains. Knowing how people think helps at least a person to be more convincing.

Why do some people think they are useless?

In answering this question, I will draw on my own experience, as I am a person with a few courses to go towards completing a BA in General Studies with an emphasis on economics. The contents of this degree are quite similar to either a liberal arts degree or a liberal arts degree, and that degree is actually one Art from a humanities degree. In other words, I'll answer that question by answering why I personally study the fine arts Not consider worthless.

  1. I am a person who has always been very curious and was ready intensely deal with different topics. I started out as a music student and learned a lot of music theory, but during the theory learning process I became very interested in math as I realized that music theory is essentially a bunch of math. This put me on the path to learning a lot of math, and over the course of that trip, I became very interested in the underlying logic of math. This in turn aroused in me a great curiosity about reality, which eventually led me to become interested in philosophy and theology. Similarly, the English courses I had to take made me curious about rhetoric, and when I found out about it I felt empowered to know that as I became more proficient in my language, I would not only be harder to deceive or cheat, but also becoming also to a person who can put forward a reasonable, logical and ultimately persistent argument in defense of my own interests and goals.
  2. I already had a job and completed an apprenticeship as a carpenter. I had an idea of ​​who I wanted to be: rough, ready, and useful in the physical world, but also articulate and analytical in my communication and when otherwise needed. Work experience helped me a lot with the former, but thorough study helped me with the latter. And whether at work or elsewhere, I apply what I have learned continuously and my knowledge grows deeper and more robust over time.
  3. Progress in my fielddo not require a degree, although the sector I work in (building construction) has a side that is definitely technical and strict . In fact, I know people who started out as apprentice carpenters in my field and later made over $ 300,000 a year as the bosses of many people with college degrees. For these people, learning and learning was essential, but only to the extent that their learning was actually relevant to the company in question. Calculus and differential equations, for example, have their place in my field, but it's just a collection of individuals at the end of the design of things that ever apply this math to any substantial degree. However, courses on these topics are required for nearly all engineering degrees. For the rest of us in my field, and that includes engineers, elementary school math is the trick most of the time.
  4. Career advancement isn't the only thing that deserves my attention! Let me leave out a little here: I'm really sick of the only things that are valuable, that apparently one directly related to money because someone looked at glassdoor.com. This way of thinking is to consider what elevator music means for jazz: boring and devoid of any creativity! Man go a little deeper Get to know Charlie Parker, learn his story, and burn the Kenny G-CDs! Or are you so boring and devoid of creativity and knowledge of the humanities that you cannot understand my metaphor? I'll tell you what: Study the work of a great CEO and you will find that they are usually extremely creative people. If you want to be a cog in a machine and partake of all that is deeply wrong with the world, then you certainly think of only dollars and cents in black and white, as if the burden of creditors were your version of holy communion, but if you really Life want , then do what helps you to get along with people connect ! Learning how to communicate with them efficiently is a good place to start if you want to connect with people. And if you want to learn how to communicate with people efficiently then excuse the STEM dogmatists, but this starts with knowing how to language because , a topic that falls directly under the umbrella of the liberal arts / humanities.
  5. My degree won't hurt my resume. Yes, HR software skips my resume because people are scared of what they don't know, but my education helped me convince people that I was worth knowing and otherwise can for a variety of endeavors can be valuable. Therefore, I have to rely on my creativity and my trust that I can include people from different backgrounds, on the one hand thanks to the fact that I am a Christian who values ​​love and understanding, on the other hand thanks to the fact that I understand and appreciate people can express my desire to love and understand in words of any desired degree of sophistication due to my educational background and my natural curiosity. Tell me who would you rather bet your money on if you were an investor looking for someone to lead a construction project - a smug engineer with a college degree who has never built anything, or a veteran who has built hundreds of Structures with his own hands that can run a team of builders and that can make you laugh when things get tense, because he can make up funny stories, because he took random fiction writing classes, but can also learn about constellations and interpretations of financial statements and accounting information based on a diverse background? My path is unique, but my education was worth every penny and hour that I devoted to it. We can hire the math specialist when the difficult problem arises and then get rid of him when it is solved. Especially when he's dry, never laughs, can't see outside his little math bubble, and is a problem - that is, when we want to maintain stereotypes about STEM types with the same level of fairness that applies to the artistic types (the divide between the two worlds is really less rigid than people think in my opinion, but I know this is because of the multidisciplinary approach to things.)
  6. I did an engineering internship because of my communication skills. And I did really well when I got back on track, mostly because of my communication skills and attitude. That got the engineers to teach me things, which in turn over-motivated me to learn math. And I did. And I still am. And I can include all of that on my résumé, but I have to slide past HR screens and meet bosses face to face and get them to look through my résumé.

Reflections:
Three things to consider:

  • First, this is effectively the average graduate of the average school in the average city.
  • Second, some of these areas tend to require a degree, or at least a thesis, to find work. The alternative is work in the hospitality, food, retail or working-class career.
  • The degrees are a stepping stone towards law and MBA, which are sure to have salary averages significantly higher than these.

Two key questions:
• I wonder how the median relates to the number of years in the field.
• I am curious to see if you have looked at graduate schools. What differences would there be?

Malcomb Gladwell & The Failure of Capitalization
Part of that is due to a capitalization error between 18 and 24 in my opinion. Our system has not been able to handle this general overcapacity of degrees, and I think many college graduates have embarked on a deeply flawed concept of education and information. You're probably due for a wake-up call ... assuming it hasn't happened yet.
This 20-minute presentation by Malcomb Gladwell explains the concept in terms of hockey and football: http://legacy.poptech.org/blog/i…
I suggest it occurs due to a variety of factors in higher education.
Note: You can view most of this presentation by searching for “Human Potential and Malcomb Gladwell” on YouTube if Vimeo is too restless or too slow.

Summary of the item data:
Sure, something to be concerned about based on the Kiplinger data:

  • Anthropology: The Unemployment is 6.9 percent, the median salary is $ 40,000, and Kiplinger says the chance of working in retail is 2.1 times the average.
  • Fine arts: The Unemployment is 7.4 percent, the median salary is $ 44,000, and the chance to work in retail is 1.8 times as high.
  • Film and Photography: The Unemployment is 7.2 percent, the median salary is $ 42,000, and the chance of working in retail is 2.0 times the average.
  • Philosophy and Religious Studies: The Unemployment is 7.4 percent, the median wage is $ 44,000, and the chance to work in retail is 1.8 times the average
  • Graphic design: The Unemployment is 8.1 percent, the median salary is $ 45,000, and the chance to work in retail is 0.6 times the average.
  • Studio Arts: The Unemployment is 8.0 percent, the median salary is $ 37,000, and the chance to work in retail is 2.3 times as high.
  • Humanities: The Unemployment is 7.6 percent, the median salary is $ 48,000, and the chance to work in retail is 1.8 times as high.
  • Theater and theatrical art: The Unemployment is 7.1 percent, the median salary is $ 40,000, and the chance to work in retail is 2.1 times the average.
  • Sociology: The Unemployment is 7 percent, the average salary is $ 45,000, and the chance to work in retail is 1.4 times the average.
  • German: Die Unemployment is 6.7 percent, the median salary is $ 48,000, and the chance to work in retail is 1.4 times the average.

Source: the article attached to the interview.

You may also want to read this latest article in the NYT on the total value of college degrees: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.co ...

A keynote on the 2nd chart in the NYT article. Maybe it's telling, but I'm a little careful to say that these comparisons make sense. Do these comparisons really take into account the return on investment over 30 years? These investments do not include the time required (let alone the 12 years previous training). These are 1-year comparisons. Also, the college degree has a lower return on investment than the associates degree. That's pretty insightful and sad - considering that you're already talking about a specific segment of people who have a taste for success and achievement.

Completing a degree in the humanities or humanities is only useless insofar as it does not prepare anyone for the pursuit of a profession. From a college student's point of view, getting a degree in any liberal arts discipline is a dangerous bet for one simple reason: debt. The humanities in their current form flourished before World War II when the emphasis in American universities was on building “character” in conjunction with training as a farmer or engineer. The applied sciences and the liberal arts were viewed as complementary rather than interfering with one another. After the war, a coincidence of public money made college not only desirable but also affordable. The average English major at UC Berkeley in 1965 did not have tuition fees as it did in 2015. Today's students rightly view their education as an investment that they'll get unless they fall back on a trust fund or make amends with their parents years after graduation. To capitalize on the current lingo, students want to maximize the ROI of their degree.

However, all of this misses the point. The prospect of debt and the utilitarian ethos that justify it pose a serious threat to the academic humanities. In this regard, the humanities are "useless" only in that they are less likely to help a student recover that debt to bring in. It does not matter that the skills highlighted in a professional qualification are out of date within a few years, and it does not matter that the majority of successful people find careers that are not relevant to their bachelor’s degree. This is because the universities were not expected to provide training from the beginning until a few decades ago. They were expected to be educational institutions, that is, institutions of personal education. A well-formed person has a general understanding of many subjects and can thus question the context for any career path they may be pursuing. Take away the context - a general awareness of the world and the people in the world - and you probably won't care about the consequences of your actions, be it personal or professional. Without context, all that matters is the act, in court.

The context is a gift from the humanities. A professor of English literature or Renaissance history will likely never tell you that taking his course will give you some insight into developing performance metrics for a business product. What reading literature and history does is to train the mind to recognize the amazing complexity of any situation, and to realize that reality seldom leans against the models we create from it. Someone with a liberal arts degree may need to learn how a company generates performance metrics, but quickly grasp their meaning and limitations, as he or she is trained to look at the context that surrounds something.

Where practical skills are explicitly discussed in professional fields (a relatively new development, by the way), the humanities disciplines usually focus on the content, with no mention of skills at all. Both conceptions of education are equally impoverished. Education as competence training gives the students no context for their activities. Education viewed as content delivery ignores all of the incredibly useful skills students acquire through interaction. The humanities offer content-related knowledge (this is how their constitutive disciplines are organized) and skills to the same extent as the ability to write conclusively, to formulate and destroy arguments, to speak in front of groups and, above all, to see things in context. Those pursuing other majors can of course think critically and question ideological constructs - such as what a “useless degree” means - but humanities courses require it.

Are the humanities useless then? Hardly, but the reason why requires context.

“Useless” is a gross exaggeration. Even ridiculous.

I'll skip the fluffy stuff about making lives better for who we are, yadda yadda yadda. Let's talk about professional preparation.

A humanities / humanities program generally involves training in writing, reading and research, and these skills are still in demand in the workplace.

Humanities are good preparation for primary school teachers and for secondary school teachers in these subjects. College professors too, of course.

Law faculties often rate liberal arts such as philosophy and history positively. These majors can also prepare someone to work as a historian or professional thinker - and our society still employs some of them.

So no, colleges obviously shouldn't stop offering these programs. The only thing I would say is that college students very thorough need to think before going into debt to pursue any of these areas. If you owe more than $ 20,000 to get a BA in Arts or Theater, you might have a major in something practical and a minor in your passion.

Fifty years ago there were no worthless degrees. I got a BA in philosophy, answered a newspaper ad on a whim, and immediately got to work for the leading computer manufacturer. Back then there were very few college graduates and many good jobs.

Today there are countless university graduates and relatively few good jobs. College in America doesn't work like it used to.

But parents and students simply blindly follow the “One Way to Win” philosophy as suggested by Dr. Kenneth C. Gray in his book written two decades ago ” Another way to win ”Was described.

Gray was concerned about the misdirection of the "academic middle" as it was being unproductively directed into four-year colleges. Over the next twenty years the problem has worsened. Today even the best academic students are at risk.

Here are the four steps:

  • Graduated from high school.
  • Enroll in a four year college.
  • Graduate with every degree.
  • Get employed in a well-paying, professional job.

In their defense, for decades they were the target of social, family, educational and political propaganda that hammered this credo. This teaching has become part of the American DNA. Parents by no means want to hear that sending little Johnny to four year college is a bad idea - especially at ANY price.

You cannot ignore the need to become financially independent. Since the great recession of 2008 there has been a lack of jobs for university graduates. College has become a competition, but the students don't know. Less than 10% of high school graduates will graduate with a bachelor's degree and get a high-paying job.
Employers have an army of potential candidates and they can pick and choose. They carefully select students who have chosen engineering, economics, math, etc. subjects.
If your parents can afford to pay for your school, fund their retirement, and support you for the rest of your life, then definitely choose a non-marketable major.

Note

Colleges and universities offer "useless" majors because they can. Parents and students are lousy consumers of post-secondary education. The information on how college pays off is out there, but most consumers don't bother reading it.

I attended a liberal arts college. A friend of mine who finished his music studies in 2012 is now studying medicine.

You could say the opposite: everyone Not- legal degree is "useless". Why? Because it only conveys data and information and does not teach students to think.

This is of course an exaggeration and I would not agree with that. What I mean to say, however, is that facts can be forgotten, but knowledge cannot. A study of the liberal arts in any area offers a deep, transferable range of skills and knowledge. Other degrees may provide the education required for a subject, but are “worthless” unless followed immediately by experience in the same subject.

The question of one College for However, the humanities is different from a humanities or social science degree. Here the answer is even clearer.

All fields of study relate to human knowledge. Is astronomy useless because we will never reach these places in space? Of course not; it teaches us a lot about physics. How about some physics? Who needs to know how an atom works? Because it can be used in engineering and technology. Who needs technology? ...

Every human pursuit has a purpose. Technology affects people's lives in one way, art in another, and history in another. Nobody can judge which of them is more important. Is Money Really the Bottom Line? Why not luck In this case, technology and money could not help but harm.

And then who can answer the question of what is most important? No science degrees, of course. At this meta-level, areas such as sociology and philosophy need to be examined to give an answer. Perhaps these are the only “useful” degrees.

I will say something else.

Math and science provide a direct route to great jobs. However, if you are economically secure, do internships and think outside the box, a liberal arts degree is not unusable.

What colleges and universities really lack is making sure students are knowledgeable about how to use your liberal arts degrees, do internships, and positively market themselves.

I have a few friends who were psycho majors, took advice, and worked for YouTube and Google. Both also took part in business clubs and competitions.

Another Felow Poli Sci Major is on her way to becoming a Marketing Manager at LinkedIn. She was a psychologist and a major in Poli Sci.

I actually do sales and marketing for a technical company.

One of my friends was an ART major. Yes, art major. She now works for CBS in digital media. Why? She took up painting for the four years, but had different interests and started looking for a job a little earlier than last year.

Granted, we all come from great universities (UCLA, UC Berkeley, Stanford), but a few also come from schools like SFSU.

What's my point All of my friends who were / are humanities majors have marketed themselves, have been hectic, and may work a bit outside of their field.

The simplest answer is that the academic humanities and humanities serve the disciplines and even some academic social or natural sciences. The skills of an academic in these subjects are based on the tradition of European education. These were the Trivium, Quadrividium, and related courses. At that time the study went over to philosophy or theology. Nowadays, modern subjects have inherited these traditions. They still keep the historical foundation and development. Your best is individual expression and humanistic inquiry, usually in school. Worst of all is little work, career development, or life demands. The benefits you are alluding to can be in technical professions such as programming, in commercial professions such as administration or accounting, or in journalism such as writing news or magazines. This work negotiates the individual will for compensation in the profession and the professional identity in the community.

You might want to google Charles Murray. Why the Bachelor still governs, but not before moving on. Watch as many of his college and BA videos as you can.

But the bottom line is that you do best what you are passionate about. Why do something else? You are always hired for someone who has a passion. Here is a small list of things to do.

1. First and foremost, it is best to get to know yourself really well before moving on. You need to know your innate talents, aptitudes, skills, learning styles, personality types, etc. If you haven't, you should take the Jung typology test. It can be found online for free (personality test at humanetrics.com)

2. Do research in an area that you have a passion or a strong interest in. And don't just think about the college catalog of life. Think about what YOU like. Then start asking around. Find the areas in your neighborhood, family, college and talk to them. Spend time with them. When I started teaching in college, I realized that Wow! I'm home. These people are just like me. SO important to be with like-minded people in your career choice. The personality type test is ideal here.

Write about it too. Brainstorming. You are often your best guru. They have more answers to your questions than anyone else. Hell, who are you most related to? You! But writing is good. Many writers have said I don't know what I am thinking until I write. Writing helps you to get in touch with your inner guru.

One last thing. Read the book Thick Face Black Heart. It's free online. Just enter the title and the PDF. Good luck

I think everyone forgets that there are two sides to choosing a college major: finding something that you enjoy, but also something that fits your life plan.

In other words, if you want to get a liberal arts degree or a liberal arts degree this is great. But what will you do afterwards? If you have family assets to rely on, or are willing to take on a low- or mid-paid job such as a teacher or professor, and the responsibilities that such a job entails, then go for it if you really can want. Just make sure you accept the ramifications of such a degree, namely the big student loans and low marketability, and try to find a way out of them.

On the other hand, I urge you not to work in a technical field that you despise just for a living.

Perhaps it is best for you to find an area in the humanities or social sciences that is a good compromise between the two, such as political science or economics. I wish you luck.

My country's (Venezuela) education system is divided into two programs when you arrive for your junior year: science or humanities. I chose the humanities department and the last word I would use would be useless , and maybe only in a zombie apocalypse. Actually, I'm not going to say such a fallacy even there.

First of all, I'm not a humanist, I have to make that clear. I want to study economics and eventually do research in areas like econometrics and game theory that apply to macroeconomics. My humanities program takes the same courses in mathematics and statistics, with the same requirements as those in the science programs. I chose humanities because I wanted to understand business from both perspectives. I believe numbers are a way of clarification and expression, but they are not the only element in this area. But I didn't come to talk about it.

I took the time to answer this question because I felt the same way once. I thought areas like philosophy, literature, or even art were useless and led to paths that got you nowhere. Today I believe the exact opposite.

Humanities study man and everything he is. Yes, the humanities do not develop advances in technology, but they play an important role in the search for knowledge because they see us for who we are. In such an industrialized world, of course, this no longer matters and is viewed as an object of ridicule. Scientific science is also being criticized more and more. The joy of learning and discovery has been forgotten, especially in these areas, and that is sad. And no, colleges shouldn't be rooting out any of these programs. The humanities make us human. Without it we are doomed. What they should be doing is reviving that old passion for learning about ourselves and teaching us how to think outside the box. We need to end this separation between these two areas because they have never been divided.

Finally, I have to remind you (and anyone who reads this) that the first scientists were humanists. Every single notable scientist from the ancient world was a philosopher or artist. Check out Da Vinci, Kant, Plato, Aristotle, Hypathia, Thales, and so many others. Also: The Science was born on the same day as philosophy. Without philosophy, we would not have developed our curiosity and our desire to know and understand nature.

Without the humanities there would be no science.

Here is a blog post that completes my answer. I find it very appropriate: Do not differentiate between students of the natural sciences and humanities on the basis of subject-specific requirements

My impression is that almost every Bachelor's degree is the same as every other with a few exceptions:

(1) Engineering degrees like an engineer instantly prepare you for high-paying careers
(2) Prestigious degrees (whether in the humanities or natural sciences) from selected schools such as Harvard and Yale prepare you for a handful of narrow careers, for example in management consulting at renowned companies

If you're just looking for an instant payback, your best bet is to go to business school or get some technical training. However, a degree is a life event - a transitional right. It's also a stepping stone for professional and college degrees - something you can really do with a liberal arts degree or some other degree.

Note that people who study business earn roughly the same as people who study Liberal Arts.The biggest difference in salaries is in technical skills.Soft skills become important later in your career when you take on leadership roles.

Where can you study if you want the highest starting salary?

Here's why liberal arts degrees aren't useless.

Many times in history there are discontinuities where something new is invented and it gives people the immediate opportunity to get in on the ground floor and ride the wave. The only problem is that no one can predict the next hot technology.

With a liberal arts degree, you develop many skills that can be a platform for learning a new technology.

My father's story. My father was an English major at the University of San Francisco. He graduated and started working in the insurance industry. He then worked as a salesman for Burroughs, selling adding machines. Soon after, computers were invented and he was one of the first to sell mainframe computers. He had a successful career and eventually rose to Vice President of Sales. His legacy continues through a scholarship fund at USF. Because he studied the liberal arts, he was strong in reading, writing and public speaking, which are key skills for success.
Obituary for Frederick Meier on SFGate.com

I have a PhD and 2 Masters degrees in a STEM field. During my training, we had to take various courses in humanities and humanities. For the most part, they were excruciatingly useless and even dangerous.

For in these classes the program of active measures of the Soviet era for Marxist indoctrination was fully in force. The Indoctrinators, also known as Teachers, carefully briefed us on the evils of US imperialism and how ridiculous and backward it was to believe in the Bible.

In fact, to this day, almost everyone I know who has dropped out of their program, especially our teachers, has a terrible anti-capitalist, anti-Christian bias. They have absolutely no idea how the real world works or, more importantly, what are the key factors in the American success story. Even the Chinese, after studying in America, had to conclude that the moral of Protestant Christianity, which focused on hard work, property rights, and fair markets, was the key to our success. You just won't learn that in most liberal arts curricula.

Until cultural Marxism is stamped out of our universities, I cannot in any way recommend the liberal arts as a main course. There will always be a need for language experts, music teachers, economists, etc., but some of these subjects can be broadly based.

Critical thinking for the liberal arts is a myth. Rather, they promote an echo chamber of carefully controlled thought patterns. If you deviate beyond this, you will lose your tenure, your job, be mocked and, more recently, for wrongly voting and being physically attacked.

I LOVE my fine arts studies.

When it comes to the liberal arts, I'll assume you mean a wide range of disciplines and subjects. During my studies, I was able to study various subjects, from criminology (comparative justice systems, landmark supreme court cases) to sociology (health and disease, sociology of Japan) to business courses (accounting, marketing, quantitative business analysis).

All in all, if I had specialized in something else, I wouldn't be nearly as culturally and understandingly as the whole world around me. Liberal Arts taught me to think critically and generally about certain topics. When you ask someone what they think about the war on drugs, they may be quoting a specific branch of thought. The sociological impact, or the criminological impact, or the political impact. While because of my foundation in the liberal arts, I see it from all of these different perspectives and understand how to better connect as a whole.

Plus, with my degree in Liberal Arts, I got a GREAT job at SaaS Sales so the job prospects are there if you are looking for it.

No, because the degree will benefit graduates who work for a company or nonprofit and are looking for a major.

Many people consider them useless because most of the graduates become teachers or are unaware of the possibilities.

The humanities are relevant courses; The reason many consider it a "useless grade" is that most Humanities majors are hired at 38,000 or less for sales and low-paying positions. If you are ready to gain work experience for a company after graduation, the degree is beneficial for promotion as higher-paying jobs may require a degree in any major for many employers.

Career entry as a psychologist or sociologist or anthropologist or in the field of criminal justice and digital media are the higher paid degrees. History and English, fine arts and women's studies may need to continue teaching or start a business if they don't want to make 38,000 or less for a starting salary. Many employers require a bachelor's degree, and the remaining humanities majors must find jobs in these categories if they cannot qualify for teaching.

* Note: The humanities are a degree that allows any student to combine two to three areas of study.

The typical topics for the humanities are listed below for your reference:

  • anthropology
  • Criminal justice
  • Digital technology and culture
  • English
  • Visual arts
  • Foreign languages ​​and cultures
  • history
  • Human development
  • Political science
  • psychology
  • sociology
  • Women studies