Can a bossless company be successful

Can team leadership be too intense?

bibliography

  1. Amason, Allen (1996), Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 123-148.

    Article Google Scholar

  2. Amason, Allen / Sapienza, Harry (1997), The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 23, pp. 495-516.

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Anderson, James C./Gerbing, David W. (1993), Proposed Template for Journal of Marketing Research Measurement Appendix, unpublished manuscript, Kellog Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston.

    Google Scholar

  4. Avolio, Bruce / Bass, Bernard (1988), Transformational Leadership, Charisma, and Beyond. In: Hunt, J./Baliga, B./Dachler, H./Schriesheim, Chester (Ed.), Emerging Leadership Vistas, pp. 29–50.

  5. Backhaus, Klaus / Erichson, Bernd / Plinke, Wulff / Weiber, Rolf (2003), Multivariate Analysis Methods. An application-oriented introduction, 10th edition.

  6. Barry, David (1991), Managing the Bossless Team: Lessons in Distributed Leadership, in: Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 20, Summer, pp. 31-47.

    Article Google Scholar

  7. Bass, Bernard (1990), Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research & Managerial Applications, 3. Edition.

  8. Berthel, Jürgen (2000), Personal Management, 6th edition.

  9. Bettencourt, Lance / Brown, Stephen (1997), Contact Employees: Relationships Among Workplace Fairness, Job Satisfaction and Prosocial Service Behaviors, in: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 73, pp. 39-61.

    Article Google Scholar

  10. Blue, Peter (1968), Interaction: Social Exchange, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 452-458.

    Google Scholar

  11. Bucklow, Maxine (1966), A New Role for the Work Group, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 11, pp. 59-78.

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Burpitt, Willam J./Bigoness, William J. (1997), Leadership and Innovation Among Teams: The Impact of Empowerment, in: Small Group Research, Vol. 28, pp. 414-423.

    Article Google Scholar

  13. Bycio, Peter / Hackett, Rick / Joyce, S. Allen (1995), Further Assessments of Bass’s (1985) Conceptualization of Transactional and Transformational Leadership, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 80, pp. 468–478.

    Article Google Scholar

  14. Campion, Michael / Medsker, Gina / Higgs, A. Catherine (1993), Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups, in: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, pp. 823-850.

    Article Google Scholar

  15. Campion, Michael / Papper, Ellen / Medsker, Gina (1996), Relations Between Work Team Characteristics and Effectiveness: A Replication and Extension, in: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 49, pp. 429-452.

    Article Google Scholar

  16. Challagalla, Goutam / Shervani, Tasadduq (1996), Dimensions and Types of Supervisory Control: Effects on Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, January, pp. 89-105.

    Article Google Scholar

  17. Challagalla, Goutam / Shervani, Tasadduq / Huber, George (2000), Supervisory Orientations and Salesperson Work Outcomes: The Moderating Effect of Salesperson Location, in: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 161-171.

    Google Scholar

  18. DeCarlo, Thomas / Agarwal, Sanjeev (1999), Influence of Managerial Behaviors of Job Autonomy on Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salespersons - A Cross-Cultural Study, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 28, pp. 52-62.

    Google Scholar

  19. DelVecchio, Susan (1998), The Quality of Salesperson-Manager Relationship: The Effect of Latitude, Loyalty and Competence, in: Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 18, Winter, pp. 31-47.

    Google Scholar

  20. Dickinson, T./McIntyre, R. (1997), A Conceptual Framework for Teamwork Measurement, in: Brannick, M./Salas, Eduardo (Ed.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications, pp. 19-44.

  21. Eisenhardt, Kathleen / Tabrizi, Behnam (1995), Accelerating Adaptive Process: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 4, March, pp. 84-110.

    Article Google Scholar

  22. Fleishman, Edwin (1998), Patterns of Leadership Behavior Related to Employee Grievances and Turnover: Some Post Hoc Reflections, in: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 825-834.

    Article Google Scholar

  23. Ford, Robert C./Fottler, Myron D. (1995), Empowerment: A Matter of Degree, in: Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 21-31.

    Google Scholar

  24. Fornell, Claes / Larcker, David F. (1981), Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 39-50.

    Article Google Scholar

  25. French, John R.P./Raven, Betram (1959), The Bases of Social Power, in: Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies of Social Power, pp. 150-167.

  26. Frese, Michael / Albrecht, Karen / Kreuscher, Roland / von Papstein, Patricia / Prümper, Jochen / Schulte-Göcking, Heike (1995), Action styles and performance behavior: The role of plan and goal orientation in problem and learning situations, in: Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organizationalpsychologie, 39th year, pp. 67-76.

    Google Scholar

  27. Fuhrmann, Hartwig / Schüder, Hartmut (1996), Motivation and Absenteeism as Measurements for Productive Leadership Behavior. An attempt at integration with the PPM management system, in: Journal for Work and Organizational Psychology, Volume 40, pp. 209–213.

    Google Scholar

  28. Gaski, John F. (1984), The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48, Summer, pp. 9-29.

    Article Google Scholar

  29. Gebert, Diether / Ulrich, Joachim (1991), Do theory and practice need a different understanding of “leadership”? Considerations on the results of a study from the banking sector, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Volume 51, pp. 749–761.

    Google Scholar

  30. Gefen, David / Ridings, Catherine (2002), Implementation Team Responsiveness and User Evaluation of Customer Relationship Management: A Quasi-Experimental Design Study of Social Exchange Theory, in: Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 47-69.

    Google Scholar

  31. Gemünden, Hans Georg / Högl, Martin (2001a) (Ed.), Management of Teams: Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings, 2nd Edition.

  32. Gemünden, Hans Georg / Högl, Martin (2001b), Teamwork in Innovative Projects: A Critical Review of Empirical Research, in: Gemünden, Hans / Högl, Martin (Ed.), Management of Teams: Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings, 2nd Edition, pp. 1–31.

  33. George, Jennifer / Bettenhausen, Kenneth (1990), Understanding Prosocial Behavior, Sales, Performance, and Turnover: A Group-Level Analysis in a Service Context, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, pp. 698-709.

    Article Google Scholar

  34. Geyer, Alois / Steyrer, Johannes (1994), Transformational Leadership, Classical Leadership Theories and Success Indicators of Banks, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Volume 64, pp. 961–979.

    Google Scholar

  35. Gladstein Ancona, Deborah / Caldwell, David (1990), Beyond Boundary Spanning: Managing External Dependence in Product Development Teams, in: Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 1, pp. 119-135.

    Article Google Scholar

  36. Greene, Charles / Schriesheim, Chester (1980), Leader-Group Interactions: A Longitudinal Field Investigation, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 50-59.

    Article Google Scholar

  37. Guzzo, Richard (1986), Group Decision Making and Group Effectiveness in Organizations, in: Goodman, P. (Eds.), Designing Effective Work Groups, pp. 34-71.

  38. Guzzo, R./Shea, G. (1992), Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations, in: Dunnette, M./Hough, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 269-313.

  39. Hackman, J. Richard / Oldham, Greg (1980), Work Redesign.

  40. Hackman, J. Richard / Walton, R. (1986), Leading Groups in Organizations, in: Goodman, P. et al. (Eds.), Designing Effective Work Groups, pp. 72-119.

  41. Hauser, Markus (1999), Theories of Charismatic Leadership: Critical Literature Review and Research Suggestions, Vol. 69, pp. 1003-1023.

    Google Scholar

  42. Help, Gabi (1998), Relationship Marketing Teams: Designing Effective Customer Relationship Teams.

  43. House, Robert (1971), A Path-Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp. 321-338.

    Article Google Scholar

  44. House, Robert / Dessler, Gary (1974), The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Some Post Hoc and A Priori Test, in: Hunt, J./Larsen, L. (Ed.), Contingency Approaches to Leadership, pp. 29-55.

  45. Janssen, Onne / Van De Vliert, Evert / Veenstra, Christian (1999), How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 25, pp. 117-142.

    Article Google Scholar

  46. Yeah, Karen (1995), A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 256-282.

    Article Google Scholar

  47. Jewell, Linda / Reitz, H. Joseph (1981), Group Effectiveness in Organizations.

  48. Jöreskog, Karl / Sörbom, Dag (1993) LISREL 8, A Guide to the Program and Applications.

  49. Kirkman, Bradley / Rosen, Benson (1999), Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, pp. 58-74.

    Article Google Scholar

  50. Korsgaard, M. Audrey / Schweiger, David / Sapienza, Harry (1995), Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 60-84.

    Article Google Scholar

  51. Kumar, Nirmalya / Stern, Louis W./Anderson, James C. (1993), Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 1633-1651.

    Article Google Scholar

  52. Lechler, Thomas (1997), Success Factors in Project Management.

  53. Manz, Charles / Sims, Henry (1993) Business Without Bosses.

  54. Moon, Mark A./Armstrong, Gary A. (1994), Selling Teams: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda, in: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 14, pp. 17-30.

    Google Scholar

  55. Moon, Mark A./ Forquer Gupta, Susan (1997), Examination the Formation of Selling Centers: A Conceptual Framework, in: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 31-41.

    Google Scholar

  56. Morgan, B., Jr./Glickman, A./Woodard, E./Blaiwess, A./Salas, E. (1986), Measurement of Team Behaviors in a Navy Environment (NTSC Report No. 86-014), Orlando / TL.

  57. Neuberger, Oswald (1995), Lead and be led, 5th edition.

  58. Pearce, Craig (1997), Key Account Management in the Business to Business Field: The Key Accounts’s Point of View, in: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 17, Fall, pp. 17-26.

    Google Scholar

  59. Pearce, Craig / Gallagher, Cynthia / Ensley, Michael (2002), Confidence at the Group Level of Analysis: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationship Between Potency and Team Effectiveness, in: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 75, pp. 115-119.

    Article Google Scholar

  60. Pearce, John / Ravlin, Elizabeth (1987), The Design and Activation of Self-Regulating Work Groups, in: Human Relations, Vol. 40, pp. 751-781.

    Article Google Scholar

  61. Pelled, Lisa / Eisenhardt, Kathleen / Xin, Katherine (1999), Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 1-28.

    Article Google Scholar

  62. Perry, Monica / Pearce, Craig / Sims, Henry (1999), Empowered Selling Teams: How Shared Leadership Can Contribute to Selling Team Outcomes, in: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 35-51.

    Google Scholar

  63. Pepper, Jeffrey (1982), Organizations and Organization Theory.

  64. Pfeffer, Jeffrey / Salancik, Gerald (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.

  65. Pinto, Mary Beth / Pinto, Jeffrey (1990), Project Team Communication and Cross-Functional Cooperation in New Program Development, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, pp. 200-212.

    Article Google Scholar

  66. Pinto, Mary Beth / Pinto, Jeffrey / Prescott, James (1993), Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation, in: Management Science, Vol. 39, pp. 1281-1297.

    Article Google Scholar

  67. Schmidt, Klaus-Helmut (1996), Perceived Superiors Behavior, Absenteeism and Fluctuation, in: Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organizationalpsychologie, Volume 40, No. 2, pp. 54–62.

    Google Scholar

  68. Sosik, John / Avolio, Bruce / Kahai, Surinder (1997), Effects of Leadership Style and Anonymity on Group Potency and Effectiveness in a Group Decision Support System Environment, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 89-103.

    Article Google Scholar

  69. Staehle, Wolfgang (1999), Management: A Behavioral Science Perspective, 7th Edition.

  70. Stewart, Greg / Manz, Charles (1995), Leadership for Self-Managing Work Teams: A Typology and Integrative Model, in: Human Relations, Vol. 48, pp. 747-770.

    Article Google Scholar

  71. Stewart, Greg / Manz, Charles / Sims, Henry (1999), Team Work and Group Dynamics.

  72. Stock, Ruth (2004), Drivers of Team Performance: What Do We Know and What Have We Still To Learn ?, in: sbr, Vol. 56, pp. 274-306.

    Google Scholar

  73. Stone, Eugene F. (1988), Moderator Variables in Research: A Review and Analysis of Conceptual and Methodological Issues, in: Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 6, pp. 191-229.

    Google Scholar

  74. Tannenbaum, Scott J./Beard, Rebecca L./Salas, Eduardo (1992), Team Building and its Influence on Team Effectiveness: An Examination of Conceptual and Empirical Developments, in: Kelly K. (Ed.), Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial / Organizational Psychology, pp. 117-153.

  75. Thibaut, John / Kelley, Harold (1959), The Social Psychology of Groups.

  76. Wilson, D./Lilien, Gary (1992), Using Single Informants to Study Group Choice: An Examination of Research Practice in Organizational Buying, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 3, pp. 297-305.

    Article Google Scholar

  77. Wurst, Katharina / Högl, Martin / Gemünden Hans Georg (2001), Collaboration in the Early Phases of Multi-Team Development Projects, in: Gemünden, Hans Georg / Högl, Martin (Ed.), Management of Teams, Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings, pp. 219–236.

  78. Yeatts, Dale / Hyten, Cloyd (1998), High Performing Self Managed Work Teams: A Comparison of Theory to Practice.

  79. Zaccaro, Stephen / Marks, Michelle (1999), The Roles of Leaders in High-Performance Teams, in: Sundstrom, E. (Ed.), Supporting Work Team Effectiveness, pp. 95-125.

  80. Zerbe, Stefan (2000), Global Teams: Organizational and Technical Design of Cooperative Arrangements.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Organizational Sciences, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany

    Priv.-Doz. Dr. Ruth Stock

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priv.-Doz. Dr. Ruth Stock.

additional information

Preferred areas of work: market-oriented company management, teams in the sales area of ​​companies and customer relationship management.

The author would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for funding the habilitation project in the context of which this article was created.

About this article

Cite this article

Stock, R. Can team leadership be too intense? Schmalenbach's Z business economics research57, 33-52 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372760

Download citation

JEL classification

Keywords

  • Leader Behavior
  • Team performance
  • Teams
  • Leadership behavior
  • Team success
  • Teams